<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You don&#8217;t write compilers in COBOL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rpgandprogramming.com/2008/06/you-dont-write-compilers-in-cobol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rpgandprogramming.com/2008/06/you-dont-write-compilers-in-cobol/</link>
	<description>Not Role Playing Games, but the RPG programming language and the craft of programming.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Larry Holder</title>
		<link>http://www.rpgandprogramming.com/2008/06/you-dont-write-compilers-in-cobol/#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Holder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rpgandprogramming.com/?p=10#comment-650</guid>
		<description>Long live COBOL (and RPG).  I wrote tons of COBOL / CICS during my early years with Wal-Mart DP in the early 80's (in what I call the "fun years").  Followed by more of the same here at UT Martin (before they switched to an Oracle-based application and the kludge they call PL/SQL).  COBOL will never die.  As far as functions, if I needed one, I wrote it in Assembler and called it (long live Assembler!) from COBOL.  I look at C and Java stuff and think, what a mess.  Those who dismiss COBOL or think it is dead or dying are quite misinformed.  And for doing what they are meant to do, COBOL and RPG are classic workhorses.  Ever seen a report written in C?  What a joke.  Long live COBOL!  Long live RPG!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long live COBOL (and RPG).  I wrote tons of COBOL / CICS during my early years with Wal-Mart DP in the early 80&#8217;s (in what I call the &#8220;fun years&#8221;).  Followed by more of the same here at UT Martin (before they switched to an Oracle-based application and the kludge they call PL/SQL).  COBOL will never die.  As far as functions, if I needed one, I wrote it in Assembler and called it (long live Assembler!) from COBOL.  I look at C and Java stuff and think, what a mess.  Those who dismiss COBOL or think it is dead or dying are quite misinformed.  And for doing what they are meant to do, COBOL and RPG are classic workhorses.  Ever seen a report written in C?  What a joke.  Long live COBOL!  Long live RPG!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Computer Programming Functions</title>
		<link>http://www.rpgandprogramming.com/2008/06/you-dont-write-compilers-in-cobol/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Computer Programming Functions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rpgandprogramming.com/?p=10#comment-232</guid>
		<description>I have read several articles about computer programming functions but this post is very interesting to me compared to the other articles when i found it on Wednesday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read several articles about computer programming functions but this post is very interesting to me compared to the other articles when i found it on Wednesday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

